Lady Gaga came to Hong Kong and I wasn't invited to go protest. Man...I am really outside the "in crowd" circle!
Seriously though, one of the benefits of not hanging out with the fringe elements of Christianity (though some would argue they are mainstream) is that I don't see as much of the "crazy" as I used to.
So at the "small group" Bible study meeting at our home last week I was surprised to hear that a number of church groups had organized protests of Madam Gaga's 4 night concert stint in Hong Kong. These protests were dwarfed by other protests on the Asian tour in the Philippines, Indonesia, and South Korea but hey, this is Hong Kong, and you know...we're busy!
I got to hand it to us Christians though, nothing demonstrates God's unconditional love coming into the world through Jesus Christ more than a good protest. Because, surely, when John the Baptist was unjustly imprisoned by Herod, Jesus led a protest and a prayer vigil to see him released. And when Paul the Apostle was living in hedonistic Greek cities like Corinth and Ephesus, he regularly led protests to show the early churches disgust at the sexual immorality of temple priests and prostitutes in their community.
Yep, nothing prepares a seeking heart to receive God's love more than anger and perceived self righteousness...
...NOT!
Anyhow, as the "home group" conversation continued we talked about what made Lady Gaga so popular. In addition to a knack for singing some catchy tunes, she's essentially doing what the church is supposed to be doing. The outcasts, the neglected, the disenfranchised, and others who feel alienation find in Lady Gaga a heart of compassion, acceptance, and love...things Jesus specialized in and commanded us to continue after his resurrection. In an increasingly disconnected world, people are looking for shelter from the storm...and many of them find that shelter in the lyrics and affirmation of Ms. Gaga.
The tax collector, the drunk, the tavern keepers, the prostitutes, all genuinely liked being around Jesus. It was at his feet that they found grace and mercy. For most evangelical Christians however, there is a real discomfort in even being around "worldly" people unless its at an evangelistic meeting where the Christian has the home field advantage. Jesus on the other hand seemed to enjoy going into the homes of "sinners". He had to have because the religious leaders of the day were always accusing him of it. And what seems to have really irritated those leaders was that Jesus enjoyed doing it.
So if you're a Christian who doesn't really love and enjoy people who are "sinners" you have your first glimpse into why hundreds of thousands of people prefer Lady Gaga to you.
Here endeth the lesson!
Thoughts on Kingdom, Church, and Grace from an American living in Hong Kong
Monday, June 4, 2012
Sunday, June 3, 2012
Steve's Letter to the Editor
Some of you saw my photo on Facebook of the "Letter to the Editor" that I wrote and was published in the South China Post newspaper this week. Some asked for a full reprint as they couldn't read the top of the picture and, not being in Hong Kong, did not have quick access to the paper.
Just for a bit of context;
The letter is a response to an op-ed piece from a few days previous when a columnist was really calling into question some aspects of legality in Hong Kong. What was especially troubling to me was that this columnist sits on the Basic Law Committee of the National People's Congress Standing Committee. For the layman, that means he helped arrange the mini-constitution (The Basic Law) which protects the rights of Hong Kong since the assumption of sovereignty by China from Great Britain 15 years ago.
Meaning this guy is supposed to be protecting the Rule of Law in Hong Kong...not call it into question!
The piece was really chafing against me all that Friday evening and the little voice inside said "Just forget about it..."
Saturday morning came and I couldn't forget about it...
... so I banged out the following response to the op-ed:
To the South China Morning Post:
My letter was published 4 days later...
Just for a bit of context;
The letter is a response to an op-ed piece from a few days previous when a columnist was really calling into question some aspects of legality in Hong Kong. What was especially troubling to me was that this columnist sits on the Basic Law Committee of the National People's Congress Standing Committee. For the layman, that means he helped arrange the mini-constitution (The Basic Law) which protects the rights of Hong Kong since the assumption of sovereignty by China from Great Britain 15 years ago.
Meaning this guy is supposed to be protecting the Rule of Law in Hong Kong...not call it into question!
The piece was really chafing against me all that Friday evening and the little voice inside said "Just forget about it..."
Saturday morning came and I couldn't forget about it...
... so I banged out the following response to the op-ed:
To the South China Morning Post:
I found the premise behind Lau Nai-keung's recent opinion piece (Hong Kong needs a time out from self serving legislators) to be very troubling. Without coming out and saying it he uses the recent incident of the Legco filibuster to call in to question the very idea of "rule of law" in Hong Kong. He contrasts a "Western mindset" whose legal procedure trumps common sense as being responsible for the filibuster as opposed to the Chinese way where, "legality has no overriding authority."
First, creating a confrontational dichotomy between Western and Chinese ways is not entirely helpful in an International city like Hong Kong. Second, to suggest that Hong Kongers may find a society where "legality has no overriding authority" appealing is largely insulting. Mr. Lau would replace legal authority with "rules (that) should be adaptable to changing conditions....if that purpose is good, then it is OK; but if bad, then no way." The Hong Kong people would then be subject to the whims of what was thought to be "good" that day. And whose version of what is "good" do we use? Mr. Lau's idea of what is good would certainly be different than that of "Longhair" Leung Kwok-hung, and our new Chief Executive elect Leung Chun-ying's version of "common sense" may be different from other community and business leaders.
In the years leading up to the Handover, when even the most ardent Hong Kong Chinese nationalists were asked if there was any positive contribution British colonialism made to Hong Kong, most would grudgingly admit, "the rule of law". To chip away at this precious commodity Hong Kong has, and which many countries desire, is to do so at our peril.
Steve Hackman
Park Island, Ma Wan
My letter was published 4 days later...
Labels:
China,
Hong Kong,
Politics,
Social Commentary,
Steve's Life
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Walking Home From Mongolia with Rob Lilwall
![]() |
| Rob's journey made the front page |
| Rob & Leon at the finish! |
| I would not want to carry that pack! |
But, we wanted to do it as a family!
Anyhow, the big moment as we waited at the Discovery Bay pier to begin was wondering where Rob would be joining us. He ended up arriving on a small "junk" (boat) and as the junk approached Rob suddenly jumped in the water and swam to the group to applause and cheers of "well done". We could all only imagine what it would be like to have been walking for 6 months straight and now, to be joining friends and family for the final 7 kilometers.
| With Rob and his wife Christine |
We all journeyed together for about 2 hours until Rob & Leon, leading out front, reached the Silvermine beach. They dove into the water together completing an astounding 5000 kilometer odyssey.
| It was a family affair! |
Friday, May 25, 2012
George Washington & Religious Tolerance
I'm a big fan of George Washington. As a child growing up he was frequently referred to as "The father of our country" in school and now as an adult I see how he created an ethos during his presidency about what kind of country the United States should be that still resonates with us into the 21st century.
I mean, here was a guy that could have been "president for life" and enjoyed all the trappings of monarchy but instead set a precedent of "temporary" power by refusing to run for a third term and shunning many of the indulgent aspects of being the Head of State and Head of Government that he could have demanded. Only the most secure of individuals voluntarily gives up power after they have achieved it...George Washington was just such a man!
And now a letter he had wrote in his own hand is about to go on public display and it highlights the religious tolerance he envisioned for the new land which still serves as a testimony to the nations of today. The letter was written to the Hebrew Congregation of Newport Rhode Island and it sought to assure the Jewish population there that they had nothing to fear as they pursued their religion:
That the United States and her citizens would "give bigotry no sanction" and "persecution no assistance". As Nicholas Cage says in the movie National Treasure after reading a portion of the Declaration of Independence, "People don't talk like that anymore".
Washington closes the letter (which can be read in its entirety here) by saying:
"That everyone should sit in safety under his own vine and fig tree and there should be none to make him afraid". As someone who gets to travel a bit, I see how most governments in the world still use fear to keep their citizens in line. Keep them fearful and keep them insecure... Washington in 1790 proclaimed that citizens of the United States would not live in fear...that especially in their own lodging is where they could feel safe.
Most people living in the world today have no such guarantee from their government.
Nicholas Cage was right, people just don't talk like that anymore!
I mean, here was a guy that could have been "president for life" and enjoyed all the trappings of monarchy but instead set a precedent of "temporary" power by refusing to run for a third term and shunning many of the indulgent aspects of being the Head of State and Head of Government that he could have demanded. Only the most secure of individuals voluntarily gives up power after they have achieved it...George Washington was just such a man!
And now a letter he had wrote in his own hand is about to go on public display and it highlights the religious tolerance he envisioned for the new land which still serves as a testimony to the nations of today. The letter was written to the Hebrew Congregation of Newport Rhode Island and it sought to assure the Jewish population there that they had nothing to fear as they pursued their religion:
The citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for having given to mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal policy—a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship.
It is now no more that toleration is spoken of as if it were the indulgence of one class of people that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights, for, happily, the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens in giving it on all occasions their effectual support.
That the United States and her citizens would "give bigotry no sanction" and "persecution no assistance". As Nicholas Cage says in the movie National Treasure after reading a portion of the Declaration of Independence, "People don't talk like that anymore".
Washington closes the letter (which can be read in its entirety here) by saying:
May the children of the stock of Abraham who dwell in this land continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other inhabitants—while every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and fig tree and there shall be none to make him afraid.
May the father of all mercies scatter light, and not darkness, upon our paths, and make us all in our several vocations useful here, and in His own due time and way everlastingly happy.
G. Washington
"That everyone should sit in safety under his own vine and fig tree and there should be none to make him afraid". As someone who gets to travel a bit, I see how most governments in the world still use fear to keep their citizens in line. Keep them fearful and keep them insecure... Washington in 1790 proclaimed that citizens of the United States would not live in fear...that especially in their own lodging is where they could feel safe.
Most people living in the world today have no such guarantee from their government.
Nicholas Cage was right, people just don't talk like that anymore!
Saturday, May 19, 2012
Beijing Daily stung over Ambassador Locke's finances
![]() |
| Locke buys a coffee at Starbucks with daughter |
In Mainland China of late there has been a growing demand by the public for government officials to make public their finances and personal wealth. This demand however is near anathema in a system renowned for its lack of transparency and opaqueness of accountability.
The Beijing Daily, in an attempt to deflect criticism, chose to show that United States officials would be no different. They did this by attempting to embarrass U.S. Ambassador to China Gary Locke.
But first a little context to this story.
Gary Locke is the first ethnically Chinese American to assume the post of ambassador to Beijing. Since he took up the position last August his easy manner and "man of the people" demeanor has already won praise from the Chinese public as well as scorn from the Chinese government. The humbleness of an official of his level carrying his own bags and using a coupon as he pays for his own coffee at Starbucks has served as a stark contrast to the airs of privilege and indulgence so often associated with officials in Mainland China. Such contrast has served for fodder for the micro bloggers who make up the voice of the people in China nowadays...much to the chagrin of the Chinese government.
I
In addition, the recent escape of blind activist Chen Guangcheng to the U.S. Embassy and Ambassador's role in the affair has only made Beijing more irked with the charismatic Mr. Locke.
It's in this context that the government's mouthpiece, the Beijing Daily, demanded, "Gary Locke, please disclose your (financial) assets."
But the plan backfired because lo and behold.. he did!
All U.S. public officials personal finances are available as a public record so the embassy issued a copy of Ambassador Locke's financial disclosure to the Beijing Daily. In addition, many Chinese "netzians" found the financial statements of the Ambassador and notified the paper.
The article making the demand online was quickly deleted. (funny that)
People who have their hand in the till make the wrong assumption that everyone has their hand in the till...only to be surprised when they don't.
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
The LOST finale episode redux
I recently re watched the finale episode of the T.V. series LOST. It's been two years now since the show wrapped and I remember there was a real polarization between those that thought it it was a grand, and daring ending and those that felt "cheated" at having invested 6 seasons into a show that really did require a lot of emotional investment and then fail to answer what they considered key questions.I am part of the first group obviously. I loved the show then and now realize that it actually gets better with time. Ok, spoiler alert, the rest of this post deals with the episode itself so if you don't want to know what happens...stop reading now.
The last episode has two different storylines being played out simultaneously. The first storyline is dealing with the castaways final battle on the Island that has been their home for 6 seasons against the "Man in Black". The second storyline is in modern L.A. and has the castaways in everyday lives connecting to each other and "remembering" their time on the Island. The castaways are drawn to a church where the lead character Jack, meets his deceased father, Christian. Its at the church that Jack "remembers" his time on the Island and in an emotional scene discovers that he, like all of his friends, are dead. Some, he learns, before him some long after him.
Jack and his father then move into the main church sanctuary and into a celebration of closest and dearest friends greeting and hugging one another. It is at this point that the the story resonates with my heart as a Christian. I am one of these people that long "to go home". I want to be where God is and in this scene I felt just a glimpse of eternity. I love the joy of everyone's faces in the church scene. After so much pain and misery they experienced in their lives and on "the Island", all of that is behind them now. There is no more weeping. As Jesus promises, "I will wipe away all of their tears."
As important as their time on the Island was, it really was just a small prologue to the journey they were preparing to begin...and with those they love. As Jack begins to enter into the celebration the scene shuttles back and forth between the joy he is experiencing in heaven and his dying moments having sacrificed himself on the Island to save his friends.
Because he is now in eternity everything seems to be happening at the same time...which I think has been one of the best representations of eternity shown on TV. The bible often alludes to our already being seated with God in heavenly places. That I am both living out a life in a linear mortal timeline on earth yet at the same time I am celebrating in heaven.
The episode ends as Jack "dies" and at the same moment Jack's father Christian (yes, Christian Shepherd) opens the main doors of the church letting in a heavenly light. For me, it was a highly emotional moment and puts everything into perspective. One day I too shall die, but I know, I am already greeting family, friends, and my Lord in eternity.
Labels:
Christianity,
LOST,
Television,
TV You Should Watch
Sunday, May 6, 2012
When Heaven Touches Earth: La Sagrada Familia
Sorry for the delay in posts but I just returned from 10 days in Spain. What a beautiful country! And more generally, what is it about Europe that is just so darn cool? The food, the architecture, the history...sometimes its overwhelming.
Well, on my first day in Barcelona I got to visit the famed Antoni Gaudi designed cathedral La Sagrada Familia. Let me say, I have been blessed to travel the world more than the average person and have had the opportunity to see some beautiful cathedrals but...
...this is the most beautiful church I have ever been in!
As our tour guide was explaining the history of the building outside its main entrance he replied to me, "Wait until you see the inside, its even more impressive than the outside." And he was right. When I entered the the vast place of worship I was suddenly overwhelmed. A picture can not convey the moment. My eyes misted up and I just stood there and absorbed it.
For lack of a better description the place felt...elven.
Those who are familiar with J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings and the subsequent movies will understand when I say I felt like I was in Rivendell or Lothlorien. The elves in Tolkien's world are higher than men, the first born of God. One commentator noted that they are best described as what mankind would look like had we not "fallen." The elven feeling of the place was reinforced when the tour guide explained that the architect, Antoni Gaudi, designed to the large columns and pillars to resemble trees and branches.

Looking around La Sagrada Familia I kept thinking this place was designed by a person inspired by the Holy Spirit. I asked the tour guide if Gaudi was a religious man? He replied "Yes, this entire cathedral was designed by him to reveal the Glory of God!
He certainly succeeded. I have recently posted a bit about Brian Zahnd's book Beauty Will Save the World describing how Christianity needs to dial up the focus of the beauty inherit in our faith.
La Sagrada Familia is certainly an example of this. It's in places like this that for one brief moment you feel like Heaven touches Earth!
...this is the most beautiful church I have ever been in!
For lack of a better description the place felt...elven.
Looking around La Sagrada Familia I kept thinking this place was designed by a person inspired by the Holy Spirit. I asked the tour guide if Gaudi was a religious man? He replied "Yes, this entire cathedral was designed by him to reveal the Glory of God!
He certainly succeeded. I have recently posted a bit about Brian Zahnd's book Beauty Will Save the World describing how Christianity needs to dial up the focus of the beauty inherit in our faith.
La Sagrada Familia is certainly an example of this. It's in places like this that for one brief moment you feel like Heaven touches Earth!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






